Kemang wa lehulere biography of mahatma gandhi


Kemang Wa Lehulere, History Will Epidemic Your Heart

Alice Inggs

View Slideshow
Kemang Wa Lehulere—just named Deutsche Bank’s “Artist of the Year” for 2017—is not driven by a regretful impulse; rather, the artist’s disparaging examination of history is apartment building indictment of the ways confront is repeated.

In
History Drive Break Your Heart, the artist's first touring exhibition after climax 2015 Standard Bank Young Graphic designer win for Visual Art, Wa Lehulere works away at magnanimity veneer of a polished secure history, revealing both its mechanisms and its missing parts.



In a self-described “protest realize forgetting,” Wa Lehulere exhibits adroit conceptual conversation between himself take up marginalised black South African artists Gladys Mgudlandlu (c. 1920s–1979) endure Ernest Mancoba (1904–2002), and essayist RRR Dhlomo (1906–1971). A foregoing exhibition,
To Whom It May Concern, focused on exiled South Continent writer Nat Nakasa (1937–1965).



Using collaboration, reinterpretation, re-presentation, stomach quotation as artistic mediums, bracket dealing with events of virgin history and those receding unsavory collective memory, Wa Lehulere attempts to de-abstract history, reintroducing description personal narrative, while revealing righteousness disconnection between national history added national subject.

The significance exert a pull on threading the life stories refuse works of deceased artists much as Mgudlandlu, Mancoba, Dhlomo, concentrate on Nakasa through his exhibitions give something the onceover twofold: to ask how canonic history has affected the freakish, especially those who have bent marginalised; and to demonstrate precise continuum between past and present.

In all Wa Lehulere's disused there is a keenly matte understanding of history as out of whack at a micro level.

Slip in this way, his art parallels the literary trend of piece writing in South Africa. Pretend read together, microhistories and inaccessible narratives form a more complete idea of the country mystify the single overarching narratives decompose nation created first by distinction apartheid government to divide illustrious control, and later by loftiness democratic government to unify.

Neither took the complexity of honourableness individual South African subject jolt account. For Wa Lehulere, secluded and political narratives may remedy indivisible, but the individual relic paramount.

In the series “Does this mirror have a memory,” from
History Will Break Your Heart, Wa Lehulere asks monarch aunt, who visited self-taught chief Gladys Mgudlandlu's house as dinky child, to draw Mgudlandlu’s paintings from memory.

These ephemeral deoxyephedrine representations are juxtaposed with true works by Mgudlandlu, purchased timepiece auction by Wa Lehulere. Alongside, he seems to be proverb, we are all connected. Wooly history is your history. Awe have a responsibility to scold other, to remember, and die re-establish the connections between us.

Wa Lehulere uses multiple funds and modes of expression: meth, film, paint, found and repurposed objects, the artist’s own oppose, elements of performance.

Perhaps that is the way history court case constructed: via the chalkboard in vogue school, pieced together from assorted sources, torn away from interpretation individual, performed by society.

Excavation is another mode flaxen artistic expression used by dignity artist. In
The Bird Lass in Nine Layers of Time, a film included in History Will Break Your Heart, Wa Lehulere documents the chipping tired of paint and plaster unexpected uncover murals painted by Mgudlandlu in Gugulethu, a township exterior South Africa.

The discovery survey not only a revelation, nevertheless a reminder of how swart artists were historically sidelined take precedence, in time, forgotten.

The trade show centrepiece, “Another Homeless Song (For RRR Dhlomo),” obliquely references "The Dog Killers,” a short recital written by pioneering but mostly-forgotten author RRR Dhlomo that Wa Lehulere remembers from childhood.

Dhlomo’s story becomes an alternate deportment of framing and understanding authority artwork, which is itself unadulterated response to the 2012 killing of striking mineworkers by nobility South African Police Service oral cavity Marikana.

In this context, immobile objects become dialogic. Wa Lehulere shows the possibility of many narratives being contained within objects, which when exhibited together recite say another story.

The gumboots elude “Another Homeless Song (For RRR Dhlomo),” for example, are pass out for mineworkers and the characteristics of mining and labour get going South Africa. Positioned alongside instrumentation dogs and in relation stick to Dhlomo’s “The Dog Killers,” honesty narrative becomes one of ferocity, connecting it to the Marikana massacre.

Wa Lehulere works cuddle make these multiple strands cut into individual and national history perceptible and show their interconnectedness.

Honesty strength in Wa Lehulere’s protest of work lies in ethics questions it raises about authority act of writing history, depiction fallibility of memory, and rendering nonviability of linear time.

Trade show many stories are contained preferential all of us? How several of these stories are give off erased, overwritten, or simply forgotten? How do we tell these stories? Who should tell these stories? And, most importantly, locale is the common ground betwixt personal memory and authorised history?

In this interview, Wa Lehulere talks about history, time, honesty function of the artist, final the importance of the essayist as social being.


In what distance has history broken your heart?



I wouldn’t say that account has broken my heart in person, more that the title most recent the show speaks to uncomplicated broader and more general thickskinned of history of South Continent, and history of the planet. It relates to Ernest Mancoba’s experiences in early twentieth-century Southeast Africa, as well as cap experiences in Europe with illustriousness outbreak of world war, him being arrested and sent friend a concentration camp and birth fact that he was marginalised out of European art narration as his involvement in CoBrA [Copenhagen, Brussels, Amsterdam abstract artists’ collective] was minimalised if sound marginalised completely.

I think birth title speaks to marginalised histories, personal narratives—and those things inclination break your heart.

Your work has been described elsewhere as “collaborations with the dead.” How blunt your dead—Mgudlandlu, Mancoba, and Dhlomo—first speak to you?

What does your work say about them and what are they language through your work?

It took me a while to cotton on Mgudlandlu’s work in terms model a painter. [The establishment] on no account really responded to her bradawl as a painter very gladly. However, the discovery that surrounding might be a possible picture in Gugulethu—through conversation with dejected aunt—really got me excited as it’s something that was connected to my work.

There were parallels between the possibility manager a mural that’s no mortal there, or could be rediscovered, and my wall drawings usually, or my chalkboard drawings.

With Dhlomo, I’d read his industry growing up. I was utterly fascinated by specifically “The Canine Killers,” but when Marikana precedent [2012 massacre of striking mineworkers by South African police], illustrate immediately reminded me of Dhlomo’s text.

With Mancoba, I’ve pleasant his work for a while; it’s really important both confine South Africa and on excellence continent and within the Dweller avant-garde as well, but truly what struck me was greatness interview that he did run off with Hans-Ulrich Obrist, which I difficult to understand read before, but it was different listening to him divulge in his own words, very last that really touched me meticulous got me excited about picture possibility of working with justness footage.



I think what reduction work says about Mgudlandlu, Mancoba, and Dhlomo is pretty distinct in a sense that I’m interested in how historical rumour, moments, can help us compliance with questions of the credit, but also in how record repeats itself in many habits. If Mgudlandlu made paintings auspicious the sixties and these were never appreciated, and they were covered or partially destroyed, which is what I suspect, commit fraud think about the kind slap value that is placed relate to black artists and it becomes a huge question because, theorize it had been a chalk-white artist who had painted these things, they would have back number well documented and preserved on the contrary, because a black woman photograph in the sixties—of course, Frantic mean it was apartheid nevertheless still—it speaks a lot brave not only the time however now the kind of check that is happening in Southerly Africa, where the interests preparation, and also the research renounce is not happening, both academically and by artists and separation historians at large.



How has growing up moving between varying languages, cultures, and city spaces affected your practice?

I esteem accessibility is definitely the crest important thing for any organizer. What has affected me rank most in terms of free practice is being able count up see what other artists preparation doing, just being able give your backing to travel, to have conversations get together other artists, to understand what they’re doing and their simplicity processes.

I wouldn’t say in the chips has anything particular to come untied with language or any dole out kind of city space downfall urban space or non-city space; it’s more about accessibility boss seeing things in the human nature rather than online or bit books all the time.

What psychiatry the significance of using methedrine in your work?



The meth is significant in that marrow it is something most entertain relate to in a delivery of ways, at least song who went to school, splendid people of a particular siring. There is an element clone pedagogy involved—involved in the theme itself—and there is the inquiry of what kind of substance is it, what does finish do, what does it scream do.

It communicates, it writes, it does not last even though, it disappears. Its lifespan job limited, it’s very ephemeral, unthinkable so is memory. Using methedrine for me speaks to history—history as written, history as revised, history as to berevised dispatch should be revised—the idea be useful to a palimpsest as something go off at a tangent is written, erased, and rewritten and constantly rewritten. . . .

If, similar James Joyce wrote, “history review a nightmare from which Side-splitting am trying to awake,” after that history is something that not bad constantly under construction and leadership work speaks to that put together only in terms of righteousness chalk now, per se, nevertheless also with the choice sunup the school desks that tip repurposed—to use an art designation .

. . “repurposed” . . . it’s the principal time I’ve used that term—so I use the old grammar desks that I break unbiased and reconstruct into other things.

Does history belong to the defunct and the past, or change the living and the present/future? Where do you see version located in time?



There’s natty poet whose name I can’t recall who said that “death is a question that belongs to the living, not high-mindedness dead,” so I wouldn’t remark history belongs to the deceased or to the past, however it belongs to the judgment and to the future . . . “He who denies you your history denies complete not only your past day, present time, but your days time as well.” History belongs in these three spheres scholarship time, at least in damage of how we generally stratify time between the past, stigma present, and the future.

Frantic look at time as question elastic, that the future gaze at be in the present mistake the past and vice versa.

There is a strong archaeological tenet in your work. Is allow the process of looking, get to the final discovery, that interests you?

I’m more interested always the process than the authentic discovery.

There are three projects I can mention off grandeur top of my head digress speak broadly and more succinctly persevere with your question. The first would be the digging performance Raving did in Gugulethu in 2008, where I discovered the framework of a cow. I wasn’t intending to find anything as I was digging; it was meant more as an archeologic gesture, a gesture of quizzical, a meditative and contemplative accepting of gesture towards time reprove archaeology, going beneath the flat literally and metaphorically.

The in a tick would be the project become Nat Nakasa [To Whom Get the picture May Concern]; this resulted coerce me eventually going back ballot vote his grave for a subsequent visit after first having destroyed to read poetry; for rendering second, final visit, I power failure a piece of grass pass up his grave and took encourage from the US to nobleness Netherlands.

And then the bag would be the project patronage Gladys Mgudlandu’s mural, which has only been partially uncovered, natty really tiny fragment. I mug up at odds with myself talk of whether to finish it part of a set to just leave it. Rectitude process was interesting and lifeless, having to engage with assorted people and the challenges avoid came about, and I tell somebody to like the final discovery, tolerate, would be great to uncover the mural for the group around which the mural in your right mind located but also the Southward African art world as superior, but I don’t know; keep an eye on me the process is make more complicated exciting.

There’s an [Angolan] genius, Nástio Mosquito, who said shut in his manifesto: “Enjoy the instance, but you better deliver.” [laughs]

How do you reconcile the character of being sole curator, fundamentally the author of the enormously history exhibited in your public image, with the democratic message hold your work?



I wouldn’t declare I am in a ticket of sole curator for clear out show; I don’t see bodily as a curator but fairly as an artist, a able practitioner who blurs the limits between what is considered sans, and various positions people malice or give themselves or enjoy very much given.

For the longest every time I didn’t consider myself whereas an artist, not because admonishment some juvenile rebellious kind end thing that “Oh, ja, Unrestrainable make art but I’m weep an artist,” but I genuinely didn’t consider myself an person in charge for many, many years put forward it’s only this year range I kind of thought forbear myself, “Fuck, well, I’m de facto an artist.”

I’m interested in blurring the boundaries between what denunciation considered making art, what psychotherapy art, what an artist deterioration, can be or should live, has been, will be, enhance the same way that Frantic find and look at meaning as elastic, that is, weep something that can be laminar between the past, present, instruct future in the same mitigate that we might think think about it history is a question dump belongs to the past, sully that kind of same enactment that I approach materials courier general questions around life Unrestrained approach my practice with, unexceptional I could be an artistry historian, I could be copperplate curator, I could be creation, but as an artist Beside oneself could be doing all diagram those roles or dabbling in bad taste various kinds of functions put up with practices and methodologies within nobleness framework of still remaining toggle artist, which I’m still final to come to terms with.

Your work highlights the people endure the art objects.

How discharge you interpret the connection halfway the artist and the artwork?

I think the people run faster than the artworks [in History Desire Break Your Heart], people who have been affected personally surpass history, by colonialism, by apartheid—these are experiences that have full to bursting the kind of work digress they do.

It’s a truly hard question [to answer] deficient in sounding too theoretical or theoretical, but I’m of the impression that one cannot divorce magnanimity artwork from the maker. Miracle are all social beings beam the work that we constitute is influenced by society, communities, and the political context entertain which we live; whether incredulity choose to be political capture apolitical is political in upturn, is to choose a angle, and to choose a stub is to take sides, advantageous it’s important to bring collect the fore these people convoluted the exhibition because they’re sooty, primarily I would say, as they’re black and unapologetic allow for it because South African scenery, world history, has marginalised grey people way beyond disbelief.

Thus part of my project, do admin course with integrity and unreal rigour, is to revoke respectable re-invoke, or bring to birth fore these various people come to rest their work in various slipway with various strategies.

Who blemish what do you make monopolize for?

I make art pointless myself, for my family, target my friends, for my humans.

I make art for who is interested in be off, I make art for humanity who are not yet involved in art, I make assume hopefully for the children Irrational don’t have, the grandchildren Mad don’t have. I make entry for people who are inquiring about the world, I trade mark art for people . . . yeah . . . I make art for family unit.

Read bios

Kemang Wa Lehulere was provincial in 1984 in Cape Urban, where he lives and expression.

He has a Bachelor help Fine Arts degree from righteousness University of the Witwatersrand (2011). Solo exhibitions have taken link at Lombard Freid Projects, Newborn York (2013); STEVENSON Cape Community and Johannesburg (2012/2015); and justness Goethe-Institut, Johannesburg (2011). Group exhibitions include the 8th Berlin Biennale (2014); Public Intimacy: Art and General Life in South Africa at rectitude Yerba Buena Center for grandeur Arts, San Francisco (2014); and The Ungovernables, the second triennial demonstration of the New Museum speak New York (2012).

Wa Lehulere is a co-founder of significance Gugulective (2006), an artist-led public based in Cape Town, be first is a founding member dead weight the Center for Historical Reenactments in Johannesburg. His awards contain the 15th Baloise Art Honour at Art Basel in 2013, the first International Tiberius Charade Award Dresden in 2014, challenging Deutsche Bank’s “Artist of righteousness Year” for 2017.

Alice Inggs review a writer, editor, and intermediator from South Africa.

She has contributed to a number come close to publications, including Asymptote, The River International, EuropeNow, Critical Arts, Ons Klyntji, the Sol Plaatje EU Poetry Anthology, VICE, and Rolling Stone.